Perbedaan antara Hazard And Risk

Kadang aku berfikir kalau hazard dan risk atau risiko adalah hal yang sama, tapi untuk menentukan perbedaan yang sebenernya kamu cukup baca penjelasan di bawah ini. Here we go...

The Royal Society in their seminal work on risk analysis, perception and management  de?ne the terms hazard, risk, risk assessment and risk management as follows: Hazard is a property or situation that in particular circumstances could lead to harm. Risk is the probability that a particular adverse event occurs during a stated period of time, or results from a particular challenge (where an adverse event is an occurrence that produces harm).

Risk assessment is the term used to describe the study of decisions subject to uncertain cons-quences. It has two components: risk estimation and risk evaluation.

1. Risk estimation includes: the identi?cation of outcomes; the estimation of the magnitude of the associated consequences of these outcomes; and the estimation of the probabilities of these outcomes.
2. Risk evaluation is the complex process of deter-mining the signi?cance of the estimated risks for those affected. It therefore includes the study of risk perception and the tradeoff between perceived risks and perceived bene?ts. Risk management ?ows from risk estimation and risk evaluation, and is the making of decisions concerning risks and their subsequent implementation.

These de?nitions have been used as the basis for policy development in a variety of applications but the increased focus on risk as a basis for the policy development and regulatory control in a range of settings since the 1980s has resulted in a proliferation of terms and risk assessment techniques. In the United Kingdom the government’s Inter-departmental Liaison Group on Risk Assessment (ILGRA), an informal committee of senior policy-makers on risk issues, was established in 1996 and disbanded in 2002. It found that the use of risk assessment had not developed systematicall in government, but had simply evolved within departments. The lack of a common terminology was identi?ed as a major obstacle to the pro-motion and understanding of the concept of risk assessment. The ILGRA was therefore tasked with considering how greater coherence could be achieved and to explore the possibility of develop-ing risk-related protocols for integrating the various inputs into policy decisions and the regu-latory framework. In their third and ?nal report in 2002, ILGRA [7] noted that government depart-ments had prepared and published framework documents explaining the procedures, protocols and criteria they applied in making risk-based decisions.

Cara download di adsenfe.blogspot.com